My research addresses questions in social and political philosophy from a mad theoretic perspective. I am interested in mad mental states as a starting point form which to do philosophy, and the kinds of insights we can get from taking seriously those perspectives and contributions that are more readily dismissed or pathologized. My PhD research examined personal autonomy in the context of bipolar disorder, examining what the ideal of autonomy looks like when the recurrent mood shifts of bipolar disorder is taken as a starting point. I argued for a much more pluralist and contextual ideal of autonomy that accommodates the many ways our agency can be configured, given the great diversity of human minds. I continue to explore this theme, explicating the relationship between autonomy, mental disorder, and human flourishing.
I am more broadly interested in social and political questions informed by this perspective: how do we live well together, given this diversity in the way our minds might be? Mad conceptions of value and agency can inform novel and revisionary ways of understanding our social relations. I am currently developing a project to examine moral responsibility form a mad perspective, exploring the role of recognition in relationship repair.