This article is part of our online news archive

Scientists discover how nature controls the level at which 'superbug' E.coli clones evolve to take over the human gut

A 'superbug' clone of E. coli has evolved to prevent itself from becoming so dominant that it could potentially wipe out the bacteria from existence, scientists led by the University of Birmingham have discovered.

ecoli 900

The researchers investigated how and why a clone of E. coli called ST131 - dubbed a ‘superbug’ because it is resistant to multiple drugs - has become the major cause of drug resistant E. coli infections

A ‘superbug’ clone of E. coli has evolved to prevent itself from becoming so dominant that it could potentially wipe out the bacteria from existence, scientists led by the University of Birmingham have discovered.

The researchers investigated how and why a clone of E. coli called ST131 - dubbed a ‘superbug’ because it is resistant to multiple drugs - has become the major cause of drug resistant E. coli infections, but not so dominant that it has wiped out other clones that do not have multi-drug resistance.

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a type of bacteria common in human and animal intestines, and forms part of the normal gut flora - the bacteria that exist in the bowel. There are a number of different types of E. coli and, while the majority are harmless, some can cause serious food poisoning or infections including in the urinary tract or bloodstream.

The number of cases of E. coli have risen by 27% from 32,309 in 2012-13 to 41,060 in 2017-18. The rise has been linked to an increase in antibiotic resistant infections caused by so-called ‘superbugs’.

Dr Alan McNally, of the University of Birmingham’s Institute of Microbiology and Infection, said: “The most globally dominant clone of E. coli that is resistant to multiple drugs is called ST131.

“Earlier research has shown that while ST131 emerged and rapidly spread in the late 1990s, it caused no more than 20% of clinical cases of E. coli once it had emerged on the scene.

“Our research has shown this is because of a type of evolutionary selection called negative frequency dependency selection (NFDS).

“Essentially, there’s no benefit to any one clone becoming the only clone in existence as, if this were to happen and all other clones of E.coli disappeared then something happened to the dominant clone, E.coli would disappear altogether.

“Following our research, we now know that while there are significantly dominant drug resistant clones of E. coli such as ST131 and other new ones are emerging all the time, it seems highly unlikely that any of them are ever going to become a completely dominant clone because this process called NFDS controls the balance across the whole E. coli population.”

Professor Jukka Corander, of the Wellcome Sanger Institute in Cambridge, the University of Oslo in Norway, and the University of Helsinki in Finland, said that as part of the research the scientists also analysed almost 1,000 genome sequences of strains within ST131 to see if they could find any genetic patterns that may explain how this process happens.

“We found that in the ST131 clone there was a lot of variation in the genes that are involved in allowing the bacteria to colonize in the human gut when compared to those in non-drug resistant bacteria that are very closely related to ST131,” he said.

“If a person is going to get a bloodstream or urinary infection from E. coli it usually comes after it has colonized in the gut, therefore we now know that genetically something has happened to this superbug which allows it to colonise the gut far more competitively than other E. coli.

“If we can understand why a multi-drug resistant E. coli out competes our resident healthy E.coli in the gut, we can try and find ways to prevent this from happening. This now needs to be the focus of further research.”

The research, published today in mBio, was also carried out in collaboration with the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and Imperial College London.

For more information please contact Emma McKinney, Communications Manager (Health Sciences), University of Birmingham, tel: +44 (0) 121 414 6681, or contact the press office on +44 (0) 7789 921 165.

  • The University of Birmingham is ranked amongst the world’s top 100 institutions. Its work brings people from across the world to Birmingham, including researchers, teachers and more than 6,500 international students from over 150 countries.
  • McNally et al (2019). ‘Diversification of colonisation factors in a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli lineage evolving under negative frequency-dependent selection’. mBio.
  • mBio is a bimonthly peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the American Society for Microbiology in association with the American Academy of Microbiology.
  • Fitting of the negative frequency dependency selection (NFDS) model to longitudinal UK survey data of bacteraemia cases in this research was made possible by a revolutionary technique for complex computer simulation-based models developed earlier by a team led Professor Corander. This accelerated Artificial Intelligence-driven technique has recently been made freely available through the open-source ELFI software platform, which is already opening up new venues for bacterial population modelling.
  • Authors of the research were Professor Alan McNally, Professor Jukka Corander, Teemu Kallonen, Christopher Connor, Khalil Abudaha, David Aanensen, Carolyne Horner, Sharon Peacock, Julian Parkhill and Nicholas Croucher.
  • This research was supported by the Health Innovation Challenge Fund (HICF-T5-342 and WT098600), a parallel funding partnership between the UK Department of Health and Wellcome. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health, Public Health England or Wellcome. Teemu Kallonen is funded by the Norwegian Research Council JPIAMR grant no. 144501. Jukka Corander is funded by the ERC grant no. 742158. Nicholas Croucher is funded by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship, jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and Royal Society (Grant Number 104169/Z/14/Z). Christopher Connor is funded by the Wellcome MIDAS doctoral training program at the University of Birmingham.