We need a well-informed and collaborative regulator for health care

Steve Gulati, Associate Professor at the Health Services Management Centre, reflects on the Health Secretary saying the CQC is ‘not fit for purpose’.

Nurses and doctors walking in a hopsital.

“The new Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has condemned the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as ‘not fit for purpose’ and cites a range of issues – ranging from the qualification and experience of inspectors through to backlogs and inconsistencies in the inspection regime – as being of serious concern.

Whilst some may interpret these comments as part of a political ‘new broom’ approach, the observations will resonate with many delivering and leading health and social care services. Anecdotal evidence from senior NHS clinicians and leaders confirms that the CQC is too often viewed with suspicion, even fear, raising serious doubts about its credibility.

A well-informed, collaborative and collegiate regulator – with a clear mission and informed inspectors – is in the interests of healthcare staff and patients alike. The changes required are as much about culture and relationships as about structures, and Mr Streeting’s forthright intervention provides an opportunity to rethink approaches to quality and safety in health and social care. The adage that ‘you can’t inspect quality into a system’ is broadly true, a well-functioning regulator is in everybody’s interests.”

Notes for editors

  • For media inquiries please contact Ellie Hail, Communications Officer, University of Birmingham on +44 (0)7966 311 409. Out-of-hours, please call +44 (0) 121 414 2772.

  • The University of Birmingham is ranked amongst the world’s top 100 institutions. Its work brings people from across the world to Birmingham, including researchers, teachers and more than 8,000 international students from over 150 countries.