New recommendations published on how to improve and accelerate testing of chemicals

New recommendations from DEFRA’s Hazardous Substances Advisory Committee (HSAC) have set out steps that could make the UK a world leader in chemical testing.

A female scientist working in a lab.

New recommendations from DEFRA’s Hazardous Substances Advisory Committee (HSAC) have set out steps that could make the UK a world leader in more ethical, safer, and cost-effective chemical testing, through early adoption of a risk-based approach to regulation (also called next generation risk assessment).

Recommendations for the adoption of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in UK chemical regulation, has been published today (5th November), by the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The report includes contributions from experts at the University of Birmingham, King’s College London and the HSAC members.

NAMs are modern methods of chemical testing that utilise advanced technologies to enhance the assessment and regulation of hazardous chemicals by improving the relevance, performance, speed and reliability of toxicological testing, and to support a transition away from animal testing.

The current approach to chemicals regulation, which relies on animal testing, has failed to keep pace with the number of chemicals on the market, and has not kept pace with the advances in science that are providing new insights into the toxicology of substances and their mixtures for assessing health risks to humans and the environment. The time is right for the UK to begin the transition to NAMs-based regulation.

Professor Iseult Lynch, University of Birmingham

The report finds that the UK’s technological and scientific capabilities in public health and safety are substantially advanced enough to make the country a global leader in using NAMs for chemical safety assessments.

Iseult Lynch, Professor of Environmental Nanosciences at the University of Birmingham (UoB) and Chair of the HSAC said: “The current approach to chemicals regulation, which relies on animal testing, has failed to keep pace with the number of chemicals on the market, and has not kept pace with the advances in science that are providing new insights into the toxicology of substances and their mixtures for assessing health risks to humans and the environment. The time is right for the UK to begin the transition to NAMs-based regulation.

The UK is in a position to harvest from the investments of almost a billion pounds from national and European funded research by revisiting what types of evidence are needed to provide greater protection from toxic chemicals, which can now be part of current legal reforms in the UK, post-Brexit.

Professor John Colbourne, University of Birmingham

Key Recommendations for UK Chemicals Regulation include:

  • Adoption of a technology-agnostic definition of NAMs based on an understanding of chemical modes of action.
  • Setting of criteria for NAMs to be considered within a progressive regulatory framework, beginning with criteria for their use in chemical grouping and prioritisation.
  • Application of a Progressive Regulatory Framework that utilizes NAMs for a wide range of regulatory applications as the certainty of the findings for hazard assessment increases.
  • Establishment of UK centres of excellence and a UK national reference laboratory for the development and validation of NAMs to ensure the uptake of technological improvements within the government and private sectors.
  • Incentivisation of chemical registrants under UK REACH* to provide NAMs data indicative of the modes of action of their substances to support the implementation of a “group first” approach to chemical safety assessment.

John Colbourne, Professor of Environmental Genomics at the University of Birmingham and Director of the Centre for Environmental Research and Justice (CERJ) is optimistic that the technological roadblocks towards this transition are finally lifted after more than a decade of substantial public and private scientific investments. “The UK is in a position to harvest from the investments of almost a billion pounds from national and European funded research by revisiting what types of evidence are needed to provide greater protection from toxic chemicals, which can now be part of current legal reforms in the UK, post-Brexit.”

As well as the suggestion that the UK could be a world leader in NAMs if these recommendations are followed, the report also argues that the strategic implementation of NAMs can significantly reduce, refine, and potentially replace the use of mammalian animals for chemical safety testing, while improving hazard assessment robustness and efficiency.

Dr. Luigi Margiotta-Casaluci, Senior Lecturer in Mechanistic and Integrative Toxicology from King’s College London and HSAC member said: “NAMs and AI-enabled predictive models are rapidly enhancing our ability to understand and predict the effects of chemicals on humans and wildlife. These new approaches are increasingly contributing to safety decision-making across different sectors while reducing the need for animal testing where alternative methods are viable. However, achieving large-scale impact will require coordinated strategies for accelerating their adoption in regulatory settings, both in the UK and internationally."

The report concludes that a progressive regulatory framework is the essential first step in moving toward the integration of NAMs, which can reduce testing costs all while improving the safety and sustainability of the chemicals industry.

Notes for editors

  • *UK REACH a regulation that applies to the majority of chemical substances that are manufactured in or imported into Great Britain (GB) (England, Scotland, Wales). REACH stands for registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals.
  • For media inquiries please contact Ellie Hail, Communications Officer, University of Birmingham on +44 (0)7966 311 409. Out-of-hours, please call +44 (0) 121 414 2772.
  • The University of Birmingham is ranked amongst the world’s top 100 institutions. Its work brings people from across the world to Birmingham, including researchers, teachers and more than 8,000 international students from over 150 countries.
  • The Centre for Environmental Research and Justice (CERJ) at the University of Birmingham was established in 2022 to bridge science and law to protect and defend a healthful environment for everyone. CERJ's innovative work in regulatory and governance spheres is advancing the assessment of chemical pollution risks and promoting the fundamental right to a healthy environment.
  • King’s College London is amongst the top 40 universities in the world and top 10 in Europe (THE World University Rankings 2025), and one of England’s oldest and most prestigious universities.  With an outstanding reputation for world-class teaching and cutting-edge research, King’s maintained its sixth position for ‘research power’ in the UK (2021 Research Excellence Framework).
  • The Hazardous Substances Advisory Committee (HSAC) provides expert advice to the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on how to protect the environment, and human health via the environment, from potentially hazardous substances and articles, including nanomaterials.