Conundrum solved over HPV link with head and neck cancer

International analysis has found that discordant results between two types of HPV test linked with worse outcomes for patients

Female biomedical research scientist wearing white coat and glasses pipetting HPV test into tubes

The study shows the need for using both HPV and p16 tests to screen for patients who test positive for one but negative for the other

Patients who have head and neck cancer caused by the human papilloma virus should be double tested, after new research solves puzzle over worsening outcomes among some people.

A major international trial published in The Lancet Oncology has looked at studies from 13 head and neck cancer centres from nine countries around the world. The data of 7,895 patients has found that there is a significant number of people who have ‘discordant’ results in which the two different tests for HPV show different results.

The study found that for the one in ten of patients who have discordant HPV results, they saw significantly worsening outcomes compared to those who tested negative in both tests.

In those cases, 5-year overall survival were:

  • 81% among double positive tests,
  • 53% for patients with p16-/HPV+ test
  • 54% for patients with p16+/HPV- tests for patients

Testing for whether a cancer is HPV related is made up of two types of tests. The first, which is called HPV testing looks for the actual virus within the tumour. The second type of test looks for a protein called P16, which has been established as a commonly used biomarker for HPV. P16 is easier to use and so most people use it as the standard.

The study was funded by Cancer Research UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the Medical Research Council and brought together collaborators from across Europe, coordinated by Professor Hisham Mehanna at the University of Birmingham.

This new research has solved the conundrum puzzling the international community about why some patients respond much better to treatment than others.

Hisham Mehanna

Prof Hisham Mehanna, Professor of Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Birmingham and lead author of the paper said:

“Through an international collaboration we have been able to answer a question that has perplexed the head and neck cancer community for over two decades. In that time there has been an emergence of a new type of head and neck cancer this cancer called Human papillomavirus (HPV) related head and neck cancer, caused by the same virus that is often responsible for cervical cancer.

“What is remarkable is that patients with HPV head and neck cancer respond much better to current therapies than patients who are not HPV related. As a result, we are trying to look for less toxic treatments for these patients to reduce the burden of toxicity. For patients who are HPV negative, we are doing clinical trials to increase the intensity of treatment – to try to improve outcomes.

“Therefore, testing for HPV in head and neck cancer patients has become a real priority and this new research has solved the conundrum puzzling the international community about why some patients respond much better to treatment than others.”

Close up photograph of man smoking thin cigarette

People who smoked had head and neck cancers that acted like HPV- cancers, which are linked with worse outcomes.

Smoking factor in how HPV cancer behaves

Patients with discordant tests who smoke were at much higher risk of worse outcomes, as the study found that their cancer acted like HPV negative cancers. On the other hand, patients with discordant tests who did not smoke had tumours that had good outcomes, like HPV positive cancers.

Professor Hisham Mehanna said:

“This has significant implications on how we test head and neck cancer patients moving forward, especially in regions where smoking is still prevalent and HPV disease is not prevalent. For example, southern Europe and countries in the east. It also has significant implications for how we choose which studies to enrol these patients in, and in future what treatment they get.”

Notes for editors

For media enquiries please contact Tim Mayo, Press Office, University of Birmingham, tel: +44 (0)7920 405040

About the University of Birmingham

  • The University of Birmingham is ranked amongst the world’s top 100 institutions. Its work brings people from across the world to Birmingham, including researchers, teachers and more than 6,500 international students from over 150 countries.
  • The University of Birmingham is a founding member of Birmingham Health Partners (BHP), a strategic alliance which transcends organisational boundaries to rapidly translate healthcare research findings into new diagnostics, drugs and devices for patients. Birmingham Health Partners is a strategic alliance between seven organisations who collaborate to bring healthcare innovations through to clinical application:
    • University of Birmingham
    • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    • Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    • Aston University
    • The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    • Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
    • West Midlands Academic Health Science Network

About Cancer Research UK

  • Cancer Research UK is the world’s leading cancer charity dedicated to saving lives through research, influence and information.
  • Cancer Research UK’s pioneering work into the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer has helped save millions of lives.
  • Cancer Research UK has been at the heart of the progress that has already seen survival in the UK double in the last 40 years.
  • Today, 2 in 4 people survive their cancer for at least 10 years. Cancer Research UK wants to accelerate progress and see 3 in 4 people surviving their cancer by 2034.
  • Cancer Research UK supports research into the prevention and treatment of cancer through the work of over 4,000 scientists, doctors and nurses.
  • Together with its partners and supporters, Cancer Research UK is working towards a world where people can live longer, better lives, free from the fear of cancer.

About the National Institute for Health and Care Research 

The mission of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) is to improve the health and wealth of the nation through research. We do this by:

  • Funding high-quality, timely research that benefits the NHS, public health and social care;
  • Investing in world-class expertise, facilities and a skilled delivery workforce to translate discoveries into improved treatments and services;
  • Partnering with patients, service users, carers and communities, improving the relevance, quality and impact of our research;
  • Attracting, training and supporting the best researchers to tackle complex health and social care challenges;
  • Collaborating with other public funders, charities and industry to help shape a cohesive and globally competitive research system;
  • Funding applied global health research and training to meet the needs of the poorest people in low and middle-income countries.

NIHR is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care. Its work in low and middle-income countries is principally funded through UK Aid from the UK government.